
…Brace yourself kids, it's a long one....
For the past month I have been rehearsing for a live show that was to take place on 26 October at one of London’s premiere Art and Music venues. That performance was never to go ahead, or should I say my part in the final show was never to be.
The concert was meant to mark the 75th celebration of a well-known British institution. The headlining act is an esteemed classically-trained pianist turned dance music producer that we’ll call MH. He wrote some socially conscious songs that are to be interpreted live, show-tune style, by a big band and his gifted and personable muse who we’ll refer to as EM. Ms EM is backed by a London University-based vocal ensemble of eager, aspiring young musicians most of whom are very talented individuals in their own right. Last year a mutual acquaintance of mine and my sister’s invited her to be part of the Ensemble in an embryonic version of the show, which turned out to be a great success. Through a comedy of errors I missed out on being part of the 2008 performance. It’s one of my biggest regrets of recent memory. The Ensemble in 2008 was replete with British talent I’d come to admire from afar and it would have been a treat to work alongside them. What is more, my sister found the experience incredibly enjoyable and a lovely rapport was built up between members of the Ensemble. So much so that even after the concert was over and the last encore was sung, they continued singing jubilantly backstage, all the way through the corridors of the venue.
With all these legendary tales of musical delight I leapt at the opportunity to be part of the ‘vision’ again as MH, EM and said British Institution planned to revive the show this year. I was hoping to run into some familiar faces some with whom I’d become acquainted, having joined the Ensemble briefly last Christmas. Although not exactly a novice, I am aware I do not yet have the kind of musical prowess that a lot of Ensemble members possess so the experience was to be an education for me as well as a way to stave off the hours whiled away being unemployed. Little did I know the run-up to the show was a bigger learning curve than I could have anticipated.
I was keen to attend every rehearsal since I didn’t perform in last year’s show and would not be all that familiar with the songs. It soon became apparent that this year was to be very different from the previous. Of course there were a lot more new faces; fresh blood had joined the University plus there were those who saw last year’s show (much like me) and wished to be a part of it. What I found a bit more disconcerting was that so many of the old faces had decided not to return, even those who had said they would. Perhaps this should have been an indicator things weren’t to be as rosy as I’d hoped.
The Ensemble had two conductors for the big gig, one I will call Mr B and the other Miss A. Miss A is a natural-born teacher, a very effective communicator with a strong sense of musicality. Mr B is her antithesis. When I sang with him last Christmas he seemed like a gentle giant in whose mouth the most audacious stick of butter would not melt. D**n it, I can be such a bad judge of character. Mr B conducted us as if a gun was held to his head. He is clearly not someone who enjoys addressing large groups of people so it confounded me why he would put himself through it, only to take it out on us. He would often be short tempered, blame the vocalists for mistakes made when he failed to give adequate instructions and generally wasn’t very competent in his role. I found myself paying more attention to Miss A if I really wanted to know what I was supposed to do vocally. Unfortunately, the sopranos were stuck with him alongside the tenors, whilst the blessed altos and basses got Miss A. It shocked me to learn Mr B and Miss A had stepped forward for the position. I can only guess this year that they had some financial incentives and were just two more in the list of participants who were being reimbursed for their time (apart from the choir itself, mind you). Then again, Mr B, also happened to be a big player in MH’s record company.
I wish I could tell you my attitude towards Mr B was full of Christian charity but I’d have to add lying to my list of sins. I was constantly torn between feeling so sorry for this desperately insecure individual and wanting to hit him. It came to my attention Mr B was somewhat wary of me, often making very tentative attempts to catch my eye during breaks. However by this time he’d made such a bad impression I avoided him like a leper.
If dealing with Mr B’s mood swings wasn’t enough, behind the scenes, the maxim ‘too many cooks spoil the broth’ took on a brand new significance. An uptight, self-important Scottish diva, (let’s call him ‘Stuart’) was in charge of choreography alongside his far more palatable but almost equally pretentious assistant. My sister and some of last year’s participants who did return, assure me ‘Stuart’ wasn’t as infuriating last time around. Hmmmm. To give you an idea of what we had to put up with imagine a camped up version of Dr Cox from ‘Scrubs’
without the gold-tinged heart buried under infinite layers of grumpiness. When he wasn’t barking/swearing at us and addressing us with contempt ‘Stuart’ was dispensing copious amounts of gnomic advice on how to ‘feel’ the song and interpret them into our moves. Frankly most of these nuggets were about as useful as a broken torch in a power cut. ‘Stuart’ enjoyed the sound of his voice so much he failed to notice when one piece of his ridiculous musings cancelled out the other. The only advantage he had over Mr B, if it can be called one, is that his charisma had some entertainment value- and that he wasn't always around, thank God.
There were several other characters floating around, some more helpful than others, the rest- not very much. All these things at least for me, hindered rather than helped the rehearsals.

MH came in a couple of times to climb his soapbox of righteous indignation and in his own I-hate-public-speaking way, tried to convince us of why we should care as much about the meaning behind the songs as he did. Being the uneasy-socialist of the champagne variety that I am (living in the West and all) I could happily get behind most of these causes. However I soon realised that MH was not the great revolutionary that he would have us believe. You see for some people it’s far easier to show concern for the vulnerable and disadvantaged of society when they are somewhere else and they don’t have to really get their hands dirty. Just purchase some fair trade chocolate, read the New Internationalist and buy some environmentally friendly light bulbs and it’s enough to ease their conscience.
Of course I cannot compare the inconvenience of putting up with some inconsiderate individuals to the hardships suffered by so many across the world. My point is that MH could have made small but meaningful gestures closer to home – i.e. looking out for the members of the Ensemble from the outset and not just his own artistic and financial satisfaction.
It never occurred to MH or EM, who for all intents and purposes seemed like a woman of the people, to make it part of their contracts with the aforementioned British Institution, that all the singers, although volunteers, should have their travel costs covered, set meals for the performance and discount tickets for friends and family from the get-go? Of course not. After all, the Ensemble should have just been happy to be supporting the amazing genius of MH(!) It seemed once MH and EM signed on the dotted line they did not give a second thought to the people who would give up so much of their own time to support MH’s ‘vision’. We were told to behave like professionals but were not handled or spoken to as such. MH went as far as to call us
amateur in an interview with a British broadsheet. EM claims that they fought our corner to get catering on the day of the concert (something that did not happen the year before) and insists that none of the performers got any complimentary tickets for friends and family. Well, EM, MH and the big band were certainly not donating their time for free to the final show so they could do without the other perks. After yours truly asked about catering we were told that some would be provided-which is something I suppose. The said British Institution begrudgingly released some discount tickets (only one per ensemble member) two days before the show when most of the family and friends coming to support the Ensemble had already paid full price for theirs. Whilst EM and MH got their own private space backstage, the Ensemble were all to be shoved into one dressing room (which on the day turned out to be quite cramped) and we never did get those travel expenses. As I said this is hardly true privation neither do I wish to suggest my motives are strictly mercenary. I have always been happy to share my talent for free. As I write this I have never received payment for any singing engagement and it is not something on which I’d insist unless there were exceptional reasons. What grieved me was the generally discourteous way the Ensemble was treated by Mr B, 'Stuart' et al. I don’t think anyone’s services, whether rendered free or not should be taken for granted or regarded with contempt. With all MH’s talk of exploitative record companies and their execs, his own ethics in this area leave a lot to be desired. He was happy for us to do physically demanding choreography (holding up A2 sheets of paper, arms outstretched for nearly the whole duration of a song for example) to make a point on major issues when he and his team scarcely appeared to have a grip on the smaller ones.
The straw that broke the camel’s back came when during the final rehearsal, two days before the actual gig, Mr B and co presented us with an agreement (drafted by his and MH’s record company) in which we were told we will be filmed, our image used as and when the Institution and the record company wished and that we were never to be remunerated for any commercial use of the recording or otherwise. I doubt very much that sales of the DVD of the show will bother the charts any time soon but that’s not the point. This was to me a proverbial final slap in the face. It was indicative of the attitude of all those in charge that the Ensemble were faceless commodities to be used and disposed of as they pleased. As a solicitor I could not simply put my name to any dubious looking agreement. When I confronted Mr B with my concerns, I was not surprised to find him disingenuous and evasive. He never
did address why they presented us with the agreement so lastminute.com. Probably because if they'd given it to us any earlier many would have had the time to reflect on it and whether they would really wish to go ahead with the show. Sadly, however, EM and Miss A also showed some of their true and rather unattractive colours. In short the insinuation was that I was some kind of agitator. EM told me the agreement was ‘standard’ and that there were worse out there (yeah right, so two wrongs now make a right?) and that they would never put anything to us that would disadvantage us in anyway. Again, so why did they not show the agreement to us earlier? EM suggested I get another solicitor to look at it although being a Saturday night and the show being on the Monday it was highly unlikely. When other members of the Ensemble got wind of my reservations they too expressed their doubts. However being so late in the day many just signed the agreement anyway. Alas I’ve always been one to take the road less travelled. Mr B, told me that if I did not sign the agreement I could not perform. I wrestled with the dilemma for the rest of the weekend. After several weeks of hard work (and the odd moment of levity) it could be that I did not get to actually do the show. I had guests planning to come and watch. Besides, the sopranos were already thin on the ground and one less wouldn’t help. Some would say, 'No big deal, put up and shut up'. But it's all about the principle. All right, so it’s not the biggest of battles but I felt if I did not make a stand now, it would be easy for me to compromise on more important issues in the future. Anyway, I couldn’t respect myself if I became one of those people who made a fuss but flaked when it came to crunch time.
So I showed up for the gig on Monday knowing that it wasn't likely I would get to perform. I tried to negotiate a way of standing on stage so that I could be obscured to the cameras. I was rumbled and politely told to leave if I would not sign the agreement. I asked if an amendment could be made to make the terms more explicit and less open to abuse (as it should have been from the outset) but I was rebuffed. I’d already braced myself for the inevitable. I contacted my friend who was due to come and told him not worry buying a ticket and my mum, fully supportive of my stand, said she'd refund me the price of the ticket I bought for her as a treat (she had already seen my sister perform in the 2008 version of the show). I waited to say farewell to my fellow sopranos (much to the chagrin of Mr B) and headed home. I didn’t leave without giving Mr B a piece of my mind though. Unhappily, I admit that the experience did not bring out the best in me and I didn’t always make the right choice to rise above it. Suffice to say I've purposefully burned my bridges with the Ensemble but I'm not as bothered now by that as I might once have been. Nevertheless the weeks of practice were not a complete waste. They kept me busy when I had little else to do and I got some very handy tips on vocal technique for free, which will not go to waste. Maybe most important of all I learned one more lesson, in case I needed it, about having the courage of your convictions. I know my expectations of myself and others are sometimes too high and I need to make allowances for human frailty. Yet if someone holds themselves out as some paragon of ethical living as is the case with MH and to some extent, EM they can't complain if the accountability stakes are higher. Too many people talk a good one without the follow through. By the grace of God I don’t want to become one of them.